Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 49
Filter
1.
South African Gastroenterology Review ; 20(1):6-8, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2317500
2.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology ; 143(5 Supplement):S38, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2298431

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to widespread changes in medical practice. This study evaluated the impact COVID-19 on phototherapy in a university hospital before and after the first surge. The study encompassed the time 5 months prior to and after the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic spanning from May to July, 2021, in Taiwan, that resulted in the temporary closure of phototherapeutic unit. A total of 981 individual patients received phototherapy during the study period. More specifically, vitiligo, psoriasis (Ps) represented the groups with the highest patient numbers. The number of patients (n=413) receiving phototherapy 5 months after the re-opening phototherapeutic unit reached similar level as compared to the number (n~400) before the temporary closure due to surge of COVID-19 infections. For vitiligo and Ps, 39.6% and 41.9% of the patients resumed phototherapy after the pandemic-associated temporary closure of the phototherapeutic unit, respectively. A closer look into the patient profiles revealed no significant difference in age, gender, and number of sessions received per week between the patients who resumed or stopped phototherapy after the temporary closure in different patient groups. Comparison of profiles between patients who resumed phototherapy after the closure and who initiated phototherapy after the closure revealed that patients who initiated phototherapy after the temporary closure received more sessions of phototherapy per week as compared to those who resumed phototherapy. This study reveals a significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients undergoing phototherapy. Although the number of patients visiting phototherapeutic units may be similar before and after the temporary closure due to the pandemic, only about 40% of patients will resume phototherapy. New strategies and continuous education are needed to improve patient management in times of pandemic.Copyright © 2023

3.
BMC Pediatr ; 23(1): 155, 2023 04 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2302227

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Universal screening for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia risk assessment is recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics to reduce related morbidity. In Bangladesh and in many low- and middle-income countries, there is no screening for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Furthermore, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia may not be recognized as a medically significant condition by caregivers and community members. We aimed to evaluate the acceptability and operational feasibility of community health worker (CHW)-led, home-based, non-invasive neonatal hyperbilirubinemia screening using a transcutaneous bilimeter in Shakhipur, a rural subdistrict in Bangladesh. METHODS: We employed a two-step process. In the formative phase, we conducted eight focus group discussions with parents and grandparents of infants and eight key informant interviews with public and private healthcare providers and managers to explore their current knowledge, perceptions, practices, and challenges regarding identification and management of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Next, we piloted a prenatal sensitization intervention and home-based screening by CHWs using transcutaneous bilimeters and evaluated the acceptability and operational feasibility of this approach through focus group discussions and key informant interviews with parents, grandparents and CHWs. RESULTS: Formative findings identified misconceptions regarding neonatal hyperbilirubinemia causes and health risks among caregivers in rural Bangladesh. CHWs were comfortable with adoption, maintenance and use of the device in routine home visits. Transcutaneous bilimeter-based screening was also widely accepted by caregivers and family members due to its noninvasive technique and immediate display of findings at home. Prenatal sensitization of caregivers and family members helped to create a supportive environment in the family and empowered mothers as primary caregivers. CONCLUSION: Adopting household neonatal hyperbilirubinemia screening in the postnatal period by CHWs using a transcutaneous bilimeter is an acceptable approach by both CHWs and families and may increase rates of screening to prevent morbidity and mortality.


Subject(s)
Community Health Workers , Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Child , Bangladesh , Feasibility Studies , Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal/diagnosis , Neonatal Screening/methods , Mothers
4.
Skin Res Technol ; 29(4): e13314, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2293476

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused changes in the medical practice. However, it is unclear whether the patients receiving phototherapy for their dermatoses have been affected. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on phototherapy, focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge. METHODS: The study encompassed the time 5 months prior to and after the surge of the COVID-19 pandemic (from May to July, 2021), resulting in the temporary closure of our phototherapeutic unit. RESULTS: Nine hundred eighty-one patients received phototherapy during this period. Vitiligo, psoriasis (Ps), and atopic dermatitis (AD) represented the groups with the highest patient numbers. For vitiligo, Ps and AD, 39.6%, 41.9%, and 28.4% of the patients resumed phototherapy after the pandemic-related shutdown (PRS). No significant difference was noted in age, gender, and number of weekly sessions between those who resumed or stopped phototherapy after PRS among three groups. Patients who resumed phototherapy after PRS tended to receive more weekly sessions of phototherapy than those who initiated after PRS. Additionally, patients who resumed phototherapy showed no significant difference in the number of weekly sessions before and after PRS. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients undergoing phototherapy. Although the patient number remained similar before and after PRS, a significant portion of patients discontinued phototherapy after PRS. New strategies and continued education are needed to improve patient management in times of pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis, Atopic , Psoriasis , Ultraviolet Therapy , Vitiligo , Humans , Ultraviolet Therapy/methods , Taiwan/epidemiology , Pandemics , COVID-19/etiology , Phototherapy , Psoriasis/therapy
5.
Current Pediatric Research ; 26(9):1620-1622, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2273498

ABSTRACT

Background: A new type of Corona virus that is SARS-COV-2 called COVID-19 had a huge pandemic worldwide. On January 30, 2020 the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak of COVID19 as a public health emergency of international concern. Method(s): Descriptive and retrospective study carried out at general hospital, Sapthagiri institute of medical science and research centre from September 2020 to September 2021. Result(s): Among 153 tested neonates, 91 were SARS-COV-2 positive. Out of 91 (59%), most common symptom reported is respiratory distress in the form of TTNB (43%) and require respiratory support for longer period compared to COVID negative group. Conclusion(s): 55% of neonates were symptomatic and reported higher incidence of NICU admission rates in SARS-COV-2 positive neonates born to SARS-COV-2 infected mothers which is comparable to our study.Copyright © 2022 Scientific Publishers of India. All rights reserved.

6.
British Journal of Dermatology ; 185(Supplement 1):89-90, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2272749

ABSTRACT

As the COVID-19 pandemic hit, many phototherapy centres stopped treating patients completely or limited services to very urgent patients only. As the duration of the pandemic became evident and owing to the need to offer alternatives to systemic immunosuppressive drugs for many patients with inflammatory skin disease, we adapted our service to treat increasing patient numbers. Offering treatment over extended hours and Saturday morning, and reorganizing waiting areas and the flow of how patients entered and exited the unit allowed social distancing. This also provided time for the cleaning of equipment between patients. A survey confirmed that patients felt very safe attending treatment. Our unit has also offered a home phototherapy service since 2016 - initially four units and expanded to eight in 2018. To allow continued access for our cohort of vulnerable, shielding patients, we drew up a compelling business case and submitted a funding application to the Trust's emergency COVID-19 budget, successfully obtaining funding for an additional 10 units. Our existing Waldman home units are no longer manufactured, but we were able to source three units from existing stock and seven additional Daavlin 7 Series units from Scott Medical. The home phototherapy service offers treatment for a wide range of inflammatory skin diseases, including psoriasis, eczema, urticaria, polymorphic light eruption, pruritus and pityriasis lichenoides chronicus. In 2020, despite staff redeployment and before the arrival of the new units, patients receiving home phototherapy included 16 patients with psoriasis who were shielding or could not travel to hospital. Eighty-one per cent of patients achieved clear or minimal residual disease activity within 30 exposures or less by the end of their course, which is comparable to our hospital-based service. Rates of symptomatic erythema (E2) were 1% of total number of exposures delivered in this patient group with no episodes of E3 or E4. Our in-hospital erythema rate for 2020 was 2 2%. There were very high levels of patient satisfaction. This highlights the importance of home phototherapy and provides additional evidence that it is safe and effective. The expansion in our service brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic will allow us to extend this service to more patients in the future.

7.
British Journal of Dermatology ; 187(Supplement 1):29, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2261006

ABSTRACT

While teledermatology has been a feature of some dermatology services for some time, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to both a deterioration in waiting lists for routine patients, and the use of distance consultation as a means of providing and improving access for such patients. The majority of teledermatology platforms rely on general practitioner (GP)-submitted information and images, and most data suggest that these systems result in around 50% of patients avoiding hospital attendance through the implementation of management plans suggested by hospital-based consultants (Mehrtens SH, Shall L, Halpern SM. A 14 year review of a UK teledermatology service: experience of over 40,000 teleconsultations. Clin Exp Dermatol 2019;44: 874-81). We now report the use of an online platform (Virtual LucyTM) using patient-provided information via a structured questionnaire, and patient images uploaded following clear online guidance, reinforced by call centre interaction. The data are derived from funded National Health Service (NHS) work: there was no specific funding for its generation. In total, 3500 patients from two hospital trusts with routine waiting list pressures were invited to use the system as an alternative to eventual hospital attendance. After secure registration, they completed dermatology and general health questionnaires based on conventional medical history taking, as well as a Dermatology Life Quality Index and then uploaded one or more images as appropriate. The patient data were reviewed by a consultant and a self-populated report provided to the patient, GP and trust within 72 h. Forty-eight per cent of patients were discharged to their GP with reassurance or a management plan. Patients requiring hospital attendance were signposted to appropriate clinics (e.g. isotretinoin, phototherapy, patch testing) or to surgical clinics for biopsy or excision. Hospital trust-based consultants were able to access the platform to view images prior to any surgery. Of patients directed to hospital clinics, 32% were reclassified as being urgent - waiting list duration was the main determinant of the need for reclassification. Of all images, 0.5% were unsatisfactory, and those patients were contacted through the platform to ask for a replacement image with specific advice. One per cent of patients were contacted by clinical staff by telephone or video to clarify or expand on the information given, and approximately 1% of patients used the platform to ask for additional treatment details. There were no patient complaints, and GP and hospital staff issues related to logistics were increasingly uncommon as iterative development of the system and support processes occurred. Teledermatology using patient-derived information and images gives similar outcomes to those seen in published conventional teledermatology, puts fewer demands on clinical staff, is popular with patients and has a significant benefit to the NHS.

8.
British Journal of Dermatology ; 187(Supplement 1):29-30, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2258078

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has placed additional demands on a healthcare system that is already overstrained. While the National Health Service has coped extremely well in the face of new pressures, much of the pressure has transferred to a growing backlog of non-COVID outpatient care. Waiting lists have become unwieldy and new dermatology waiting times can be in excess of 18 months. We have developed a novel system to enable our tertiary referral dermatology department to triage rapidly and manage new patients with psoriasis, returning to target levels of activity, with minimum impact on patient care. Newly referred patients with psoriasis were sent a questionnaire, including the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), to direct their management appropriately. Patients were asked to estimate their affected body surface area using the palm measurements and affected body sites. Patients were also asked which treatment types they would be prepared to accept if offered (phototherapy, systemic therapy), as well as the type of clinic they would find acceptable. The latter included faceto- face only, telephone/video consultation or using a secure skin mobile phone app (MySkinSelfie), whereby photos are securely uploaded for viewing by the doctor but are still controlled by the patient. Of 265 patients, 222 responded (average response time 7 days). In total, 217 were offered an appointment. Thirty-one per cent were seen acutely (2 weeks) and the remainder in routine clinics. Two patients no longer wanted an appointment. An algorithm was used to place patients in appropriate clinics according to their responses. Patients who did not respond to the questionnaire within 4 weeks were sent a reminder letter and then discharged if there was still no reply (17%). Median DLQI was 15, with 63% of patients happy to have a telephone/video consultation, 72% were open to phototherapy, 80% were happy to use the MySkinSelfie App and 34% requested faceto- face appointments only. During the COVID-19 pandemic many dermatology units have had to limit the focus of their work on skin cancer, leaving little time for all but the most urgent patients with inflammatory disease. A previous systematic review and meta-analysis (Singh S, Taylor C, Kornmehl H, Armstrong AW. Psoriasis and suicidality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;77: 425-40) of 1.7 million patients with psoriasis confirmed an increased risk of suicidal ideation [odds ratio (OR) 2.05] and suicidal behaviour (OR 1.26;Singh et al.), highlighting the importance of managing these patients in a timely manner. General practitioner letters can lack sufficient information on disease severity/ urgency, but our simple model allows the department to streamline referrals quickly, ensures that the patient still wants to be seen and minimizes unnecessary hospital visits. We propose that this approach is considered by other dermatology departments to streamline outpatient waiting lists and accelerate a return to normal activity during the pandemic.

9.
British Journal of Dermatology ; 187(Supplement 1):32, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2257585

ABSTRACT

A 59-year-old man presented with a widespread morbilliform rash after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. He had no significant medical history and no known allergies. He did not take any regular medication. He developed pruritus without rash 4 h after his first vaccine. This resolved after 10 days without intervention. One day after his second dose, he developed an extensive pruritic morbilliform eruption on his trunk and limbs, affecting 35% of his body surface area. with no mucous membrane involvement. The rash persisted for 4 weeks after his second vaccination and he was referred to dermatology. Eosinophils were raised at 0.54 and liver function tests were normal. Antinuclear antibodies and extractable nuclear antigen were negative. Complement levels were normal. Histology showed mild epidermal acanthosis, spongiosis and subcorneal vesicles. Within the superficial to mid-dermis, there was a mixed chronic inflammatory infiltrate comprising lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils and numerous eosinophils. Direct immunofluorescence was negative. He received a tapering dose of oral prednisolone with mometasone topically. Despite substantial improvement with this regimen, his rash began to worsen 2 days following discontinuation of oral prednisolone. He was still using daily mometasone on cessation of oral steroids. He was trialled on oral doxycycline for 1 month, which led to a marked improvement in the morbilliform rash. Despite improvement in the rash, the patient reported ongoing intense daily pruritus which was having a marked impact on his quality of life. He has commenced on narrowband ultraviolet B (UVB) phototherapy to treat his persistent pruritis, with good effect to date. Morbilliform eruptions have been reported as a cutaneous manifestation of COVID-19 and as a side-effect of mRNA vaccines. Proposed mechanisms for the development of skin rashes post-mRNA vaccines include viral protein expression following vaccination, prior infection with COVID-19 causing cross-reaction with the mRNA vaccine encoded antigen and vaccine components acting as haptens inducing a T helper 2 inflammatory reaction characterized by interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 expression. Drug-induced maculopapular eruptions typically resolve within 7-14 days on withdrawal of the culprit medication. The persistent nature in our patient may imply a complex immune response. The use of phototherapy to treat inflammatory dermatoses and pruritic conditions such as nodular prurigo is well described. The antipruritic effect of phototherapy is thought to work via modulation of both the neural pathways involved in itch and local immune cells in the skin. Our case highlights that phototherapy can be used in the treatment of cutaneous side-effects that arise after COVID-19 vaccines. To the best of our knowledge, this case is one of the first to use narrowband UVB phototherapy to treat a cutaneous side-effect of an mRNA vaccine.

10.
British Journal of Dermatology ; 187(Supplement 1):32-33, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2255989

ABSTRACT

A 59-year-old white female who was previously fit and well, developed gradual tightening and thickening of the skin on her forearms progressing to the abdomen, chest and lower legs associated with restricted movement. She also noticed bruise-like patches on her trunk. There were no systemic symptoms and no history of Raynaud syndrome. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 lockdown, the patient had engaged in increasing amounts of exercise compared with normal;this included yoga once weekly for 75 min, high-intensity interval training for 20 min on alternate days, running three times weekly for 45 min, lifting 2.5 kg weights for the arms every day and regular long walks. Examination showed a 'groove' sign on her forearms and a peau d'orange appearance of the skin with a woody induration and hardness on palpation. Symmetrical and circumferential involvement on the forearms and lower legs and bruise-like indurated patches on the abdomen were noted. Differential diagnoses included eosinophilic fasciitis (EF), morphoea, EF/morphoea overlap, scleroderma, scleromyxoedema and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Blood investigations showed an eosinophilia of 1.2 x 109 cells L-1, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 31 mm h-1, a C-reactive protein of 20 mg L-1 and negative autoimmune and viral serology. She underwent two incisional biopsies down to fascia. The first was taken from the back, which showed an interstitial inflammatory cell infiltrate composed of lymphocytes, plasma cells and very occasional eosinophils. The subcutaneous septa were minimally thickened. The second biopsy taken from the left forearm showed striking thickening of the subcutaneous septa, with an associated inflammatory cell infiltrate, composed predominantly of lymphocytes and plasma cells. This process was deeper and more established than that seen in the biopsy from the trunk. The appearances were clearly those of a sclerosing process of the dermis and subcutis and consistent with eosinophilic fasciitis. Our diagnosis was EF with morphoea overlap and she was treated with oral methotrexate 15 mg weekly and oral prednisolone 50 mg once daily (weight 60 kg), reducing the dose by 5 mg every 2 weeks. An 80% improvement was seen in functionality within 3 months, but the skin remained tight and thickened and therefore the patient was referred for phototherapy [ultraviolet A 1 (UVA1)] as combination therapy. We present a rare case of EF, which appears to have been triggered by intensive exercise. Other causes include insect bites, radiation, infections (Mycoplasma and Borrelia) and paraneoplastic. Haematological associations have been seen, including aplastic anaemia and lymphoma. Treatment options for EF include prednisolone, UVA1/psoralen + UVA, immunosuppressive systemic agents (including ciclosporin and methotrexate), biological agents (including infliximab and rituximab) and physiotherapy.

11.
Turkderm Turkish Archives of Dermatology and Venereology ; 56:80-85, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2251411

ABSTRACT

Treatment of psoriasis differs in special cases such as in women who wish to become pregnant, during pregnancy and lactation, in pediatric and geriatric populations, in the presence of obesity or chronic viral diseases, and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to their well-known teratogenic effect, neither topical nor systemic use of retinoids is recommended in any period of pregnancy and lactation. Literature data on treatment approaches in psoriasis in children is less than in adults, and safety data usually relate to short-term use. There is a multifactorial relationship between psoriasis and obesity;response to treatment is lower in obese patients with a body mass index greater than 30. It should be noted that the elderly have comorbidities and concomitant drug use, which increases the likelihood of side effects and drug interactions of psoriasis medications. In the presence of a viral disease, many agents used in the treatment of psoriasis carry the risk of exacerbating the infection due to their immunosuppressive properties. In such a case, the option that can be considered apart from topical therapies is narrowband phototherapy. It was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic that there had been no increase in the risk of infection-related mortality and morbidity solely due to biological therapy. Copyright © 2022 by Turkish Society of Dermatology and Venereology.

12.
British Journal of Dermatology ; 185(Supplement 1):64, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2250941

ABSTRACT

Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in 2018. It is indicated for patients who have not responded to at least one systemic medication or in whom these are contraindicated or not tolerated. Response criteria to allow continued treatment include at least a 50% reduction of Eczema Area and Severity Score (EASI) and/or at least a 4-point reduction in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score. Phase III clinical trials of dupilumab in AD reported a 75% reduction in EASI (EASI 75) of 51% in SOLO1 and 44% in SOLO2. Real clinic responses may differ from trials so we performed a retrospective review of 100 patients between June and August 2020 who had received dupilumab (44% female, 56% male;mean age 41 years). Fifty-eight per cent had a recorded diagnosis of asthma and 39% had a recorded diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. Seventy-six per cent of patients had received previous phototherapy. Ninety-seven per cent of patients received at least one systemic medication prior to commencing dupilumab. Thirty per cent (n = 29) received one, 33% (n = 32) received two, 33% (n = 32) received three and 4% (n = 4) received four prior to starting dupilumab. The most common were methotrexate (61%), followed by ciclosporin (22%) azathioprine (16%) and alitretinoin (1%). EASI scores were documented at baseline. The target time for EASI response assessment was 16 weeks, but we included outcome data recorded between 8 and 16 weeks, using the score nearest to 16 weeks where multiple scores were available. Seventy-five patients had response data recorded, 18 had stopped dupilumab and seven had missing data. Outcomes were 50% reduction in EASI [EASI 50;84% (n = 62)], EASI 75 [61% (n = 45)] and a 90% reduction in EASI [EASI 90;35% (n = 26)]. Mean (SE) EASI score pretreatment was 22 2 (1 2);at 16 weeks it was 5 8 (0 9). Sixty-five per cent of patients had a documented DLQI score at 8 and/or 16 weeks. Mean (SE) DLQI scores were 17 5 (0 7) predupilumab, 5 5 (1 1) at 8 weeks and 3 7 (0 8) at 16 weeks. Mean reduction was 13 8 (1 0). Eighty-six per cent (n = 56) had a reduction of four or more. Fifty-nine per cent of patients had Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure scores recorded. Mean (SE) values were 22 5 (0 5) predupilumab, 6 2 (1 2) at 8 weeks and 7 1 (1 1) at 16 weeks. Mean reduction was 15 4 (1 0). Compared with prospective clinical trials, real-world data have the limitations of missing data and slight scoring date variations, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on missed appointments. Sixteen-week outcome data are not available for patients who withdrew from treatment. However, for the 75 patients with outcome data the proportion achieving EASI 75 and a 4-point reduction in DLQI is encouraging and similar to data from phase III trials.

13.
J Biophotonics ; 16(4): e202200306, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2274877

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 appeared in December 2019, needing efforts of science. Besides, a range of light therapies (photodynamic therapy, ultraviolet [UV], laser) has shown scientific alternatives to conventional decontamination therapies. Investigating the efficacy of light-based therapies for environment decontamination against SARS-CoV2, a PRISMA systematic review of Phototherapies against SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV species discussing changes in viral RT-PCR was done. After searching MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde we have found studies about cell cultures irradiation (18), blood components irradiation (10), N95 masks decontamination (03), inanimate surface decontamination (03), aerosols decontamination (03), hospital rooms irradiation (01) with PDT, LED, and UV therapy. The best quality results showed an effective low time and dose UV irradiation for environments and inanimate surfaces without human persons as long as the devices have safety elements dependent on the surfaces, viral charge, humidity, radiant exposure. To interpersonal contamination in humans, PDT or LED therapy seems very promising and are encouraged.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/therapy , Decontamination/methods , RNA, Viral , Phototherapy , Ultraviolet Rays
14.
Ir J Med Sci ; 2022 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2229587
15.
Biomolecules ; 12(12)2022 12 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2199740

ABSTRACT

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease in which the overproduction of reactive oxygen species plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and persistence of inflammatory lesions. Phototherapy represents one of the most used therapeutic options, with benefits in the clinical picture. Studies have demonstrated the immunomodulatory effect of phototherapy and its role in reducing molecule hallmarks of oxidative stress. In this review, we report the data present in literature dealing with the main signaling molecular pathways involved in oxidative stress after phototherapy to target atopic dermatitis-affected cells. Since oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis and its flare-up, new research lines could be opened to study new drugs that act on this mechanism, perhaps in concert with phototherapy.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Ultraviolet Therapy , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/pathology , Phototherapy , Skin/pathology , Chronic Disease , Oxidative Stress
16.
World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine ; 8(4):491-496, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2066907

ABSTRACT

Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy is a therapeutic method that can produce a range of physiological effects in cells and tissues using certain wavelengths. The reparative benefits of PBM therapy include wound healing, bone regeneration, pain reduction, and the mitigation of inflammation. Advances in the development of laser instruments, including the use of high-intensity lasers in physiotherapy, have recently led to controllable photothermal and photomechanical treatments that enable therapeutic effects to be obtained without damaging tissue. The combination of PBM therapy with acupuncture may provide new perspectives for investigating the underlying therapeutic mechanisms of acupuncture and promote its widespread application.

17.
Drug Safety ; 45(10):1231, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2047124

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Initially, vaccination against Covid-19 was not recommended during pregnancy due to the lack of data. With the benefit of hindsight, it has become recommended. This decision followed the reassuring results from pregnant women who voluntarily or inadvertently received Covid-19 vaccines, especially with mRNA vaccines [1]. In Tunisia, from May 2021, pregnant women have been prioritized in the national vaccination program with the recommendation of the messenger RNA platform. Objective: To follow-up Covid-19 vaccinated pregnant and/or breastfeeding women in Tunisia. Methods: We have started a pilot study (from September 2021 to April 2022) for monitoring pregnant and/or breastfeeding women. Data collection was carried out via telephone calls. We excluded women who were unreachable after two phone calls. The data collected concerned the course as well as the outcome of the pregnancy and the health status of newborns. In addition, women were asked about the possible occurrence of adverse effects following immunization. Results: Our study included 1253 women. Seventeen percent of them were previously infected with Covid-19. The vaccination schedule was complete (two doses) in 83% of cases. Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (PBV) was used in 73% of cases (11% of cases in the first trimester, 42% in the second trimester and 19% in the third trimester) and Moderna vaccine in 26%. Coronavac vaccine was used in 1% of cases. Vaccination was performed during pregnancy in 74 % of cases and breastfeeding in 11% of cases. Fifteen percent of women received the first dose during pregnancy and the second dose after childbirth. Reported adverse events following vaccination were: pain at the injection site in 47%, fever in 23%, soreness in 15%, asthenia in 6%, headache in 5%, hot flashes in 3% and chills in 1% of cases. Pregnancy and breastfeeding outcomes were favourable in 1246 women (99.4% of cases). Forty-seven percent of women delivered at term without incident and newborns were apparently in good health. One case of spontaneous miscarriage was reported in a woman with a history of spontaneous abortion and Covid-19 infection two weeks after receiving the first dose of PBV. Six cases of neonatal jaundice were also reported with PBV with good evolution with phototherapy. Conclusion: Our study confirms the data in the literature concerning the safety of Covid-19 vaccines on pregnant and/or breastfeeding women.

18.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology ; 87(3):AB65, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2031378

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Phototherapy is an effective, economic dermatologic treatment with few side effects. Home phototherapy has the potential to overcome barriers that patients face in accessing care (e.g., frequent clinic visits, travel, co-pays, etc.). This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a home phototherapy program at the University of Rochester. Methods: A retrospective review of electronic medical records and a telephone survey were conducted of all adult patients (≥18 years) prescribed home phototherapy for a dermatologic condition (2019-2021). Data collected from chart review included demographics and disease course. Telephone surveys consisted of 12 questions regarding device use, Perceived Global Impression of Severity (PGIS), Skindex-mini, satisfaction with care, and treatment preference. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Results: Of 63 eligible subjects, 43 (68%) participated in the survey (n = 23 psoriasis, n = 11 atopic dermatitis, n = 9 with other diseases). The average disease severity on PGIS at the time of survey was 2.72 (mild). Most subjects surveyed (88.4%) felt their disease had improved since initiating home phototherapy. All subjects preferred home therapy to in-office phototherapy due to the convenience (74.4%), distance they lived from clinic (27.9%), reduced cost (23.3%), work and household obligations (20.9%), privacy (14.0%), and COVID-19 related concerns (14.0%). Notably, 18.6% experienced side effects, most commonly erythema. Discussion: Home phototherapy is safe and effective, particularly for patients who have difficulty obtaining in-office care. It also presents a promising alternative to in-person care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Insurance carriers can save significant funds by instituting such programs and avoiding more costly systemic therapies.

19.
Molecules ; 27(17)2022 Aug 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2023948

ABSTRACT

The advancements in nanotechnology and nanomedicine are projected to solve many glitches in medicine, especially in the fields of cancer and infectious diseases, which are ranked in the top five most dangerous deadly diseases worldwide by the WHO. There is great concern to eradicate these problems with accurate diagnosis and therapies. Among many developed therapeutic models, near infra-red mediated phototherapy is a non-invasive technique used to invade many persistent tumors and bacterial infections with less inflammation compared with traditional therapeutic models such as radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgeries. Herein, we firstly summarize the up-to-date research on graphene phototheranostics for a better understanding of this field of research. We discuss the preparation and functionalization of graphene nanomaterials with various biocompatible components, such as metals, metal oxides, polymers, photosensitizers, and drugs, through covalent and noncovalent approaches. The multifunctional nanographene is used to diagnose the disease with confocal laser scanning microscopy, magnetic resonance imaging computed tomography, positron emission tomography, photoacoustic imaging, Raman, and ToF-SMIS to visualize inside the biological system for imaging-guided therapy are discussed. Further, treatment of disease by photothermal and photodynamic therapies against different cancers and bacterial infections are carefully conferred herein along with challenges and future perspectives.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , Graphite , Nanocomposites , Neoplasms , Bacterial Infections/diagnostic imaging , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Cell Line, Tumor , Graphite/therapeutic use , Humans , Multimodal Imaging , Nanocomposites/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/therapy , Phototherapy , Theranostic Nanomedicine/methods
20.
Journal of Clinical Oncology ; 40(16), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2005709

ABSTRACT

Background: Sézary syndrome (SS) is an aggressive type of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL). Due to its low prevalence, there are limited data on real-world treatment patterns of currently available SS therapies. Furthermore, recent approvals of new agents for patients with CTCL as well as COVID-19 likely impacted real-world treatment patterns. Objective: To examine real-world treatment patterns and the impact of COVID-19 among SS patients treated in 2018-2020 in the US. Methods: Patients with public or private insurance in the 2018-2020 Symphony Health Solutions database were classified into 3 groups: ≥1 diagnosis of SS (ICD-10-CM code: C84.1x) in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns for all therapies recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines version 2.2021 were examined: systemic therapy (e.g., extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), parenteral, or oral agents), skin-directed therapy (SDT, e.g., topical, local radiation, total skin electron beam therapy, or phototherapy) and bone marrow transplant. The impact of COVID-19 was assessed via quarterly analysis. National drug codes, current procedural terminology and healthcare common procedure coding system codes were used to identify all treatments. Results: The analyses included 869, 882, and 853 SS patients in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively (mean age: 66.3, 66.9 and 67.3 years;male: 54.4%, 54.8%, and 55.6%). Overall, systemic therapy increased from 2018 to 2020 (41.8% to 46.5%), with increased parenteral (20.7% to 28.7%) but decreased ECP (17.0% to 13.5%) usage. SDT increased from 2018 to 2020 (48.9% to 52.9%), with increased topical (42.3% to 48.3%) but decreased phototherapy (6.3% to 4.1%) usage. ECP, mogamulizumab, and bexarotene were the most prescribed systemic therapies in 2019-2020, with mogamulizumab being the only one with increased usage over time. Quarterly analysis showed a decreasing ECP from Q1 to Q4 within each year, with a notable drop in Q2 2020. For parental systemics, there was an increasing trend in 2019 and 2020, but utilization in Q4 2020 was lower than that of Q3 2020. For oral systemic, there was a notable drop in Q2 2020 but an increased trend in Q3-Q4 2020. Conclusions: This claims analysis indicated increased use in systemic and SDT among SS patients in 2018-2020. The quarterly analysis indicated that the drop in ECP and oral systemic usage in Q2 2020 coincided with the onset of the pandemic, but there was a stable use of parenteral systemic during 2020.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL